[tei-council] Pure ODDness

[Hugh Cayless]

Then I think the answer is "whatever is easiest to deprecate when it’s decided to disallow RNG content models." Probably #a

On Nov 20, 2013, at 9:35 , Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz at it.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> 
> On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:47, Hugh Cayless <philomousos at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> a) change the content model of <content> to permit either 
>>> model.contentPart  or macro.schemaPattern
>>> b) change macro.schemaPattern to permit either model.contentPart or 
>>> macro.anyXML
>>> c) define a new element (howabout <model>) containing model.contentPart 
>>> ; allow both that and current <content> initially, then deprecate <content>
>> 
>> Forgive the ignorant question, but how would #a work? Is more than one <content> possible? So you’d have maybe <content type="pureODD"> / <content type="RNG">? 
> 
> 
> i think what we’re talking about is allowing you to have either, not both. so we don’t have
> to convert everything in one go, and people could keep using the old notation
> in their ODDs, for example.
> 
> 
> Sebastian