[tei-council] Draft Roma Replacement Specification

[James Cummings]

On 10/11/13 10:58, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> On 10 Nov 2013, at 10:24, Fabio Ciotti <fabio.ciotti at uniroma2.it> wrote:
>
>> In my experience in the call for tender it would be nice to leave the
>> space for the proposal of ideas and new features without being too
>> restrictive with the specs. I agree that we need a tool that have at
>> least all the features of Roma + 1,  but in general developer work
>> better if they are stimulated to contribute in the modelling of the
>> system.
>
> Yes, very much so
>
> I would add that we will not have unlimited money for this, and that it will
> have to be an agile development, without fixed outcomes.

Agreed. But it is also useless to throw money at something 
without any criteria -- if they produce something that doesn't 
enable the basic most common tasks of ODD editing.


-- 
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Academic IT Services, University of Oxford