[tei-council] Electing a TEI Technical Council Chair for next year.

[James Cummings]

Thanks David,

I can't imagine that we would every need over 1 week, never mind 2, for the council elections since the electorate is so small (11 ppl).

Any other caveats you can think of?

James


--
Dr James Cummings, Academic IT Services, University of Oxford



-------- Original message --------
From: David Sewell <dsewell at virginia.edu>
Date: 2013/10/30 18:39 (GMT+00:00)
To: James Cummings <james.cummings at it.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: TEI Council <tei-council at lists.village.virginia.edu>
Subject: Re: [tei-council] Electing a TEI Technical Council Chair for next year.


The only caveat for OpaVote is that you need to pay a small fee (via PayPal,
US$5) to keep the election open and/or results live past the free window of
time, which is 2 weeks.

For the TEI elections, I paid the cost myself as a donation.

David

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, James Cummings wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> I had a look at opavote.org and ran a fake election with a bunch
> of my own email accounts. I can confirm what Peter suggested,
> that an election can be run with entirely secret voting in
> opavote where the person who set it up *cannot* know who voted
> for whom. The Chair running the election can see whether personX
> has voted or not, but not who for. Opavote has all sorts of
> features, but can set up a fairly simple vote or those which
> allow you to express your preference for candidates and their
> order. The ballots are entirely secret, the voters notified by
> email, and the final result of the ballot is open (but not who
> voted for who). So I think using that system the existing Council
> Chair can do it without any real impropriety. Do others strongly
> agree/disagree with that?
>
> After listening to the various points of view so far my
> suggestion of a protocol is as follows:
>
> 1) Up until the last Friday in November, Council members for next
> year consider whether they want to run. Before that date they
> send a statement of some sort to the Council mailing list saying
> why people should vote for them.
>
> 2) On the first weekday of December, if multiple people are
> running, then the the Council Chair sets up an opavote.org
> election with the names of the candidates. This should have the
> following settings: Results only shown at end, "Instant Runoff
> Voting" method, a single winner, "ranked enhanced" ballot type,
> and candidate order shuffled.
>
> 3) The current Chair runs the election for at least 3 days in
> early December; results are announced publicly on Council list,
> and Council members given any chance to object before being
> announced on TEI-L
>
> 4) The current Chair hands over to the new chair almost
> immediately after the election, but assists them in planning for
> the next year until the end of the year.  (Remembering that in
> theory the current Chair might be departing off council at the
> end of the year, though that isn't the case this year.)
>
> Improvements?
>
> -James
>
> On 30/10/13 11:49, Stefanie Gehrke wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>>> Any additional, dissenting or agreeing, thoughts? New Council
>>> members, how would you want it to work?
>>
>> I am fine with Fabio's proposals.
>>
>> Looking forward to building reliable relations and contributing to the work of the Technical Council.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Stefanie
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stefanie Gehrke
>> ------------------------
>> Coordinatrice Metadonnées - Equipex Biblissima
>> Campus Condorcet
>> 3 rue de la Croix Faron
>> 93206 Saint-Denis Cedex
>> Tél. : +33 (0)1 55 93 75 00
>> www.biblissima-condorcet.fr<http://www.biblissima-condorcet.fr>
>> @biblissima
>>
>> ----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Fabio Ciotti" <fabio.ciotti at uniroma2.it>
>> À: "Hugh Cayless" <philomousos at gmail.com>
>> Cc: "TEI Council" <tei-council at lists.village.virginia.edu>
>> Envoyé: Mardi 29 Octobre 2013 23:03:56
>> Objet: Re: [tei-council] Electing a TEI Technical Council Chair for next     year.
>>
>> In general I think it would be nice to have a formal procedure since
>> we cannot foresee if future composition of the Council could generate
>> conflict (I guess not, but...), especially if there is more than one
>> candidate.
>>
>> In my opinion
>>
>> 1) the person who organise and act as the scrutineer can be the the
>> senior member (better than the current Chair since in theory he will
>> have less conflicts of interests) if he is not standing for election;
>> otherwise the Council can ask the Board to designate a member for that
>> role.
>>
>> 2) direct mail is a viable solution to express votes, since the
>> votings members are only 11, but also a doodle can work. We can avoid
>> (or reduce) spamming keeping it open for just one or two days and
>> giving the link in this mailing list only one day before.
>>
>> But if there is only one candidate and all the Council members feel
>> fine with him (or more formally if no member of the Council explicitly
>> ask for the voting procedure)  I agree with Hugh, we can proceed by
>> acclamation. And finally, I am even less competent than Hugh, so I
>> will not stand for election :-)
>>
>> Fabio
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
> Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
> --
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

--
David Sewell, Editorial and Technical Manager
ROTUNDA, The University of Virginia Press
PO Box 400314, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4314 USA
Email: dsewell at virginia.edu   Tel: +1 434 924 9973
Web: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/