[tei-council] noting revisions

[Gabriel Bodard]

Tested it in the last comment at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/bugs/357/?page=1

Seems to work fine, and I think it's an excellent idea. I'm going to go 
back and add this to my last few closed tickets. :-)

On 2013-06-24 10:12, James Cummings wrote:
> Peter Stadler notes that when we put in a message like 'fixed at
> revision 12263' into the sourceforge ticket tracker we could make
> it more useful by making this a link to the sourceforge code
> revision point.
>
> This has the format of https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/code/12263/
> where 12263 is the revision number, or even easier with this
> markdown syntax is [r12263] which should become a link to the
> above.  I've not tested this, but assuming it works, it seems a
> good idea for us to adopt this as a practice and I'd add it to
> http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Council/Working/tcw20.xml where
> we mention putting what revision something has been done at on a
> ticket.
>
> Any reason why we shouldn't do this?
>
> -James
>
>
> On 24/06/13 09:51, Peter Stadler wrote:
>   > James,
>   >
>   > reading through some sf tickets I came across various
>   > "Implemented in revision xxx"[e.g. 1] messages. First, many
>   > thanks to all the council members for all the work and the
>   > documentary efforts which make it quite transparent and easy
>   > to track for other users. Though, it would make life still
>   > easier if these revisions were marked up as a link[2]. Maybe
>   > that could be added to the council sf style guide?! (if there
>   > is one?!)
>   >
>   > Many thanks again and all the best, Peter
>   >
>   > [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/449/#1e44
>   > [2]
>   > http://sourceforge.net/p/tei/bugs/markdown_syntax#md_ex_artlinks
>   >
>   >
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Digital Humanities
King's College London
Boris Karloff Building
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/