[tei-council] listRelation membership in model.biblLike
Kevin Hawkins
kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info
Wed Jun 5 08:26:46 EDT 2013
On 6/5/13 4:20 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> And I have found nothing
>> in the record to explain why it was decided to implement this by
>> changing the members of model.biblLike. It looks suspiciously like a
>> last minute kludge rather than a considered decision.
>
> after discussion which went on for 7 months?
>
> Lou noted on the ticket on 2011-11-09
> "recommendation is to use relationGrp for now since it does the job; add relationGrp to model.biblLike"?
> That is a note from a Council meeting - see http://www.tei-c.org/Activities/Council/Meetings/tcm48.xml
> The record is entirely clear - we decided on November 9th 2011 that
> "<relationGrp> will also be added to model.biblLike."
>
> maybe everyone in Paris misunderstood what model.biblLike is, but this is most
> definitely not a "last minute kludge".
I suspect that what we decided in Paris was actually to add
<relationGrp> as a child of all members of model.biblLike, but this got
recorded in the minutes differently.
--K.
More information about the tei-council
mailing list