[tei-council] respond by 1 May: summary of and path forward for "no longer recommended" and "deprecated" practices

[Gabriel Bodard]

On 19/04/2013 17:54, Kevin Hawkins wrote:
> I meant the third of these.  I have elaborated the sentence in the
> document.  As I understood our discussion, the decision to make
> something "no longer recommended" does not entail that it will
> definitely be removed in P6; therefore, we do not need to add this to
> the P6-dev page.

But they might, mightn't they? So perhaps we should say "should not 
automatically be added to the p6-dev wiki page, but may if we feel that 
it is a candidate for more proactive discussion at a post-P5 level" or 
similar?


-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/