[tei-council] Prefixing ids with "tei_"

James Cummings james.cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Fri Jan 18 14:59:22 EST 2013


Explain to me again why this isn't a one-off task where we run through the existing guidelines and prefix IDs and ptr and such? Then save them back to svn?

I'm sure you explained it to me before but I've evidently forgotten.

(About to watch Jeremy Hardy do standup)


JamesC

Martin Holmes <mholmes at uvic.ca> wrote:


Hi Lou

On 13-01-18 11:29 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> On 18/01/13 19:26, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>> The wrinkle is that I can't find a way to do just the in-page ids; I
>> have to do the page filenames as well, because @xml:ids are intimately
>> tied up with chapter page names. So where before we had SD.html, we now
>> have tei_SD.html. This will be annoying to people who have bookmarked
>> pages in the guidelines, but it could be mitigated by redirects.
>
> I think that's very annoying. It's also feature-creep -- we embarked on
> the idea of modifying the IDs because they're transparent, but the page
> identifiers are not.

I know. I don't like it myself.

>> If this change is unacceptable, then I think I'll have to give up on
>> this approach, and go for post-processing the Guidelines pages after
>> they're generated. I think that will add more time to the build than the
>> pre-processing approach.
>
> really?

I think so, because visiting every @xml:id, @target and @corresp in the
source amounts to less work than visiting every @id and @href in the
output; we generate many more links in processing than are explicitly
there in the source. Also, processing the source amounts to processing a
single file (p5.xml -> p5_prefixed.xml), whereas to process the output
would require processing every html page.

>> Let me know what you think. It may be that this whole idea is not worth
>> the trouble.
>
> It's never seemed worth the effort to me, to tell the truth. We had one
> problem, which we solved without going to these lengths.

AFAIK, the problem is still there with at least one adblock list: the
Fanboy list developers completely ignored our requests for a change.
However, their list looks like it's moribund -- no updates since August.

Cheers,
Martin

--
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived


More information about the tei-council mailing list