[tei-council] display of modified arts in P5

[Gabriel Bodard]

On 2013-01-14 11:49, James Cummings wrote:
> On 14/01/13 11:26, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> no, there is not a _promise_ that its a subset change only.
>> its possible that we might use this to open up a data type?
>
> Wouldn't that be breaking our own rules on Conformance?

I don't see why. It's not as if TEI has a global rule that @type must be 
a data.name, whether it's defined in att.typed or elsewhere on an 
elementSpec. If we did have such a rule, then any local schema that 
loosened the datatype would be breaking conformance with the TEI as a 
whole, but if we define it differently in one case, that's the thing 
people need to be conformant with, surely?

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
Researcher in Digital Epigraphy

Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

T: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
F: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
E: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/