[tei-council] display of modified arts in P5
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at it.ox.ac.uk
Mon Jan 14 06:26:33 EST 2013
On 14 Jan 2013, at 11:13, James Cummings <james.cummings at it.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 13/01/13 14:09, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> see http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/job/TEIP5/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-abbr.html
>> for the latest display which may be helpful
>
> Let me see if I'm reading this right:
> 1) This says that <abbr> gets @subtype from att.typed but not @type?
krekt
> 2) It then creates a new @type element which is modified in some
> way but I've no idea how?
yes. well, its not a new @type, its a modification of it
> 3) It says 'Derived from att.typed' to indicate this is a pure
> subset change?
no, there is not a _promise_ that its a subset change only.
its possible that we might use this to open up a data type?
i reiterate that displaying what has changed in relation
to the source is not attempted, any more than it ever has been
in documentation for a customisation before. it would mean
a serious redesign.
ultimately, one is reduced to reading the source, luke
> But since locally re-defined it won't inherit any
> future changes to att.typed's @type?
>
no, thats not true. it depends what it changed. if just the
description is what changed, anything else will be inherited
after change
> If I was an average user looking at this I would really be
> wondering why @type is redefined locally in preference to using
> the att.typed version.
>
> Should it be policy that any time we do something like this it
> requires a note/remark here about why this has been done?
yes, quite possibly. do you want to experiment and see how it would look?
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
More information about the tei-council
mailing list