[tei-council] another High Noon proposal

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 11 Jan 2013, at 16:45, Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman at Brown.edu>
 wrote:

> Two related thoughts:
> 
> * Why is this urgent? I realize we had planned for a release of the
>  Guidelines soon (14th? 17th?), but why is that carved in stone? I'd
>  much prefer to get this right and push the release a week later.

it is not carved in stone, but if Hugh has booked the time, we
don't really want to muck him about unless we really have to

> 
> * Elli Mylonas mentioned the possibility of leaving the tagdoc page
>  looking pretty much as it does, but if element <foo> has deleted
>  attribute @bar from class att.duck, then the "@bar" would be
>  crossed out in the parenthetical list of attributes that follow
>  "att.duck". (Just an idea.)


nice, but I am not sure offhand that I see how to do it :-}
its all stylesheets/common2/tagdocs.xsl for those who want to play.

now that binaryObject/@url is the only use of this delete feature,
the looknfeel may be less urgent, anyway. its not going to be
very noticeable
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services 
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431