[tei-council] another High Noon proposal

[Lou Burnard]

On 11/01/13 15:27, James Cummings wrote:
> This discussion clarifies things in my mind:
>
> a) On principle I think anything that has @type should have
> @subtype (if it can be classified it can be sub-classified).

I think that's a sensible principle which I am happy to subscribe to.
I think, btw, that we do need an additional schematron constraint to the 
effect "you can't specify @subtype without also specifying @type"
>
> b) ,.,. Claiming membership in a
> class does *not* mean you claim everything that class
> provides/enables.

We disagree on this point then.