[tei-council] lb/@ed agayne

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 9 Jan 2013, at 18:13, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> does this mean
> 
> (a) replace the <datatype> definition for data.code (currently "anyURI") 
> with that for data,word (currently a rather hairy regexp)
> (b) replace the reference to "anyURI" with a reference to data.word
> (c) replace the <datatype> definition for @ed (currently a reference to 
> data.code) with a reference to data.word
> 
> I think I would vote for (c) or (b) but not for (a)

well, actually, I was thinking of (a), in order to preserve the singular
characteristics of data.code. but I have switched to (b), which has the same
outcome

>>> with appropriate examples added for @edRef.
> 
>> would it be sensible for the example @edRef to point to a <bibl>?
> 
> No objection to that ... (assuming that this is not another case for the 
> attribute which is not @corresp)


ah well, not sure we want to go into the many very similar
but slightly variants of the "attribute which points at
something sourcelike".....

changes duly committed to att.sourced
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
http://www.justgiving.com/SebastianRahtz
Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services 
University of Oxford IT Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431