[tei-council] Code bounty candidate tools

[Gabriel Bodard]

So is it the case that ideally the completion of this work would be a 
precondition for speccing a new Roma? (I'm trying to reconstruct why we 
thought a code bounty might help with this... I guess I need to dig out 
the minutes of Oxford... unless I'm just misremembering that?)

On 13/12/2012 17:37, Lou Burnard wrote:
> On 13/12/12 17:31, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> 2. "Foxtrot" tool: Lou's proposed tool to solve the Durand Conundrum
>> (can you remind us what this does and what the problem is that it solves?)
>
> I am not sure why this got on the list of tools : the proposal is to
> make some revisions to the existing ODD format so as to enable
> everything to be expressed in TEI ODD, instead of having some bits
> expressed in a subset of RELAXNG. I believe  I am supposed to be
> completing and testing the existing proposal but would of course welcome
> input from anyone interested. When (if) the spec is completed, then
> some existing ODD processing tools may wish to change the ways they
> generate schemas, etc, but I don't see that there's need for any
> specific tool here.
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/