[tei-council] Upgrading TEI Project on SF
James Cummings
James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Wed Dec 5 12:29:43 EST 2012
On 05/12/12 17:23, Martin Holmes wrote:
> What an absolute pain this will be. I think we need to schedule it for a
> period immediately following a release, to give us maximum time to get
> everything working. I guess that means it should really be right now,
> because the next release is likely to be in April/May, and June/July is
> conference and workshop season, when everyone will be really busy.
I've been assuming that we'll probably do a maintenance release
in January to solve some of the problems people have pointed out,
but we've not timetabled anything as of yet. (adding to
teleconference agenda now)
> Another reason for moving soon is that the new members of Council who
> aren't yet familiar with the system will only have to learn the setup once.
That is true, but I think they can cope. ;-)
> If we also move things like oddbyexample, there will be more
> complication -- oddbyexample, for instance, is called during the
> Stylesheets build process, so if it's moved, the Stylesheets Makefile
> will have to be changed, or the build job will have to check it out from
> wherever it ends up. I think it would be simpler to move the whole
> shebang as-is, and treat the separation of extra bits and pieces as a
> separate task to be undertaken when we have everything working again.
That is why hiving those off to a different repository seems a
separate thing to me than upgrading to the new sourceforge platform
> Does SF have a deadline by which we need to move?
Not that I've seen so far.
> They seem to suggest that SCM stats will not be available in the new
> system. Does this matter to us?
I've not used them.
-James
--
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings at it.ox.ac.uk
Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
More information about the tei-council
mailing list