[tei-council] biblscope and imprint

Kevin Hawkins kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info
Fri Nov 2 22:14:59 EDT 2012


On 11/2/12 3:23 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
> Kevin's recommended tagging below contradicts what it currently says in
> the Guidelines:
>
> "<p>When the item being cited is a journal article, the
> <gi>imprint</gi> element describing the issue in which it appeared
> may contain <gi>biblScope</gi> elements for volume and
> page numbers, together with a <gi>date</gi> element.
>    </p>"
>
> That doesn't mean it's wrong of course... but that para should probably
> be removed.

Exactly.  In the ticket, Gabby points this out in (2) and in the same 
ticket suggests removing it as the way to address (2).

> There is also the rather nasty Thaller example in section #COBICOL which
> contains an analytic, followed by two monogrs. The article in question
> was published twice, once in a journal and once as a free standing
> monograph. If we put the page numbers for the journal publication inside
> the analytic, as Kevin suggests, how do we know that they are not
> relevant to the second <monogr>?

An excellent question.  Gabby and I didn't consider this.  I'm not sure 
what to suggest.  :(


More information about the tei-council mailing list