[tei-council] 2.2.0 / 2.1.0

[Lou Burnard]

Yes, that is the fix I am just about to check in, as per previous messages

On 27/10/12 18:09, Martin Holmes wrote:
> I think I've spotted something that may be related to this:
>
> att.duration.w3c is in the tei module, but att.duration.iso is in
> namesdates. tei_speech.odd includes both modules, so I'm not sure yet
> how the problem is happening, but can anyone remember which module these
> are supposed to be in? I suspect iso is wrong and should be in tei.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> On 12-10-27 05:28 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> I have pressed the Big Red Button, in that I have run the install on www.tei-c.org, remade the Debian packages,
>> and remade the oxygen package.  It seems important that the damage is undone as soon as possible,
>> and then worry about comms and repairs later.
>>
>> There is an issue which has emerged as a result of the build working properly.
>> Look at http://bits.nsms.ox.ac.uk:8080/jenkins/job/TEIP5/741/parsed_console/?
>> and you'll see an issue over something in tei_speech. I don't want to look at and fix
>> this now, for several reasons
>>
>>    - i am going to the pictures to see James Bond shortly
>>    - that sort of error is horrible to track down
>>    - the fix might mean  a 2.3.0 release
>>    - i have to concentrate on other stuff
>>
>> but if someone else feels strong....
>>
>> PS the fact that tei_dictionaries.* is still in the distro is something which can be fixed at leisure
>> PPS if you are an "ant"-savvy person, look at P5/Test/antruntest.xml which I started working
>> on, and see if you can finish it off. if you succeed then lo! you have built a new Roma script.
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services
>> University of Oxford IT Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>