[tei-council] datcat's ugly head

[Lou Burnard]

Let's come back to this after the release: it's tricky. My first thought 
is that a dcr:datcat on an <fdecl> establishes a default mapping, which 
might then be remapped/over=ridden by a <f> . Either that or it's an 
error. I  agree that it's more or less the same as <equiv> but that's 
probably not relevant



On 25/10/12 11:06, Piotr Banski wrote:
> May I ask the Council to have a quick look at
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=644062&aid=3569990&group_id=106328
>
> ?
>
> I'm a bit afraid that I'm trying to put a stick in our wheel, with a
> chance to succeed :-/
>
> The issue is the semantics of <fDecl> with dcr:datcat on it. I'm a bit
> afraid it's like putting datcat on <elementSpec> or <equiv> (as opposed
> to putting it on <pos> or <gram>).
>
> Thanks,
>
>     P.