[tei-council] experimental modules?

[Kevin Hawkins]

Sebastian responded to me, but I'm going to take this back to the list.

I've just realized that http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/Customization/ 
only lists XInclude as experimental but shows the dictionaries one as 
non-experimental.  Who would know which customizations are experimental?

I am unaware of any re-examination of sample customizations, so I will 
leave everything as it is for now.

On 9/3/12 6:04 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> its not the _modules_ which are experimental, but the customization.
>
> I think we should zap the dictionary one entirely, actually. But isnt this
> part of a re-examination of the sample customizations?
>
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Oxford University Computing Services
>
> ________________________________________
> From: tei-council-bounces at lists.village.Virginia.EDU [tei-council-bounces at lists.village.Virginia.EDU] on behalf of Kevin Hawkins [kevin.s.hawkins at ultraslavonic.info]
> Sent: 02 September 2012 02:12
> To: tei-council at lists.village.virginia.edu
> Subject: [tei-council] experimental modules?
>
> I just noticed that both
> http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/Customization/odds.xml and the Roma
> interface show tei_xinclude and tei_dictionaries as experimental.  Is
> this still the case?  They're not listed that way at
> http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/Customization/ .
> --
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>