[tei-council] Take a look at <listApp> spec

[Kevin Hawkins]

Two things:

a) I notice that <ptr/>s are rendered differently in your build than in 
the latest release.  I suspect this is fallout from the fix that you 
and/or Sebastian did to make URLs relative instead of absolute.

So as not to confuse the matter, here's a different element definition. 
  Compare the links after the <desc>:

http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Guidelines-web/en/html/ref-p.html

http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-p.html

b) I see the note you added for <listApp>, but it feels wrong to me to 
include this note if we don't also include it for <interpGrp> and any 
other elements that feel a bit like metadata to most of us but can 
appear within <text> because they sometimes occur there in source 
documents.  So I'm inclined to add this point to clarification to 
<interpGrp> as well, plus any other such elements.  (I know there are 
others out there because people have mentioned them, but I don't 
remember any of them or how to find them.)

--K.

On 8/14/12 1:53 PM, Martin Holmes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of work arising out of Ann Arbor, I've created an elementSpec
> for the new <listApp> element, and added a mention of it to the
> Guidelines. You can see the results here:
>
> <http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Guidelines-web/en/html/ref-listApp.html>
>
> <http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Guidelines-web/en/html/TC.html#TCAPLK>
>
> Could you take a look and see if there's anything you think should be
> changed?
>
> There is currently only one example for the element; although I have
> been asking around, no others have been forthcoming. I'm not sure
> whether we really need another example; I have considered fabricating
> one based on other examples in the TC chapter, but I'm not sure it's
> really needed -- <listApp> is pretty straightforward -- and I always
> think twice these days about making the Guidelines any bigger.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>