[tei-council] Lite Final, finally

[Lou Burnard]

Have removed teilite_ns.odd

Consistency suggests:

Exemplars/tei_lite.odd : canonical home of the ODD
Exemplars/tei_lite.xml : skeletal template file, Oxygen for the use of
tei_lite : name of schema generated

This does indeed make a break with existing tradition, but that may not 
be a bad thing -- this is a new version after all, and we want people to 
know that.

Alternatively, we turn all the "tei_lite" s back into "teilite" s, and 
have to explain why this one exemplar is different. (Historical reasons 
we might say wisely)

Your votes?

I can happily move my test file to the Test directory, or drop it entirely.

And yes, James, it probably should.

On 06/08/12 17:16, James Cummings wrote:
>
> Yes, we need to decide what this is called. Our naming convention
> seems to indicate that tei_lite.odd is the standard format.
>
> Someone has already got rid of teilite.odd, but teilite_ns.odd is
> still there. Could we agree on a single name and remove the
> others from the repository to avoid confusion?
>
> Since we are *freezing* this version of TEI Lite, should it now
> have a @source pointing to the version of the TEI in the Vault?
>
> -James
>
>
> On 06/08/12 15:18, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Aug 2012, at 15:12, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>>
>>> I have also checked in a sample Lite file to which I may add some new
>>> features shortly.
>>>
>> where are you thinking of putting that? how would people find it?
>>
>>> One thing I haven't done is change the name of the schema generated --
>>> it's still called "teilite" rather than "tei_lite". Easy to change if
>>> people think this is important.
>>>
>>
>> it bothers me a bit. I think, for good or bad, "teilite" is a fixed point,
>> so the ODD should be teilite.odd
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Rahtz
>> Director (Research Support) of Academic IT Services
>> University of Oxford IT Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>
>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>
>
>