[tei-council] they spread the word

[Piotr Banski]

Theirs is actually a serious proposal, and well-tested, with a solid 
suite of tools. Designed for linguistic annotation (PDF linked from my 
first message). The point is that it's so good that they needn't have to 
resort to this kind of careless bashing. But they did, and coming from 
serious people, the claims unfortunately may look serious to some.

   P.

On 24/07/12 23:17, Lou Burnard wrote:
> And what was their proposal exactly?
>
> On 24/07/12 21:23, Piotr Banski wrote:
>> So does Emacs, in some sense. But I doubt that the authors wanted to go
>> deeper into these issues. They needed to discard the potential
>> alternatives to their proposal. ISO LAF was dealt with right after the
>> TEI, so well, at least we're in good, CLARINesque company...
>>
>>      P.
>>
>>
>> On 24/07/12 22:11, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>> Doesn't Oxygen support all of the TEI? Ditto Roma and Oxgarage?
>>> Depending, of course, on your definition of "support".
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 12-07-24 03:47 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>>> dear me.  I think we are in the hands of people like you to correct these misunderstandings in your communities.
>>>>
>>>> of course, its true that there are no "tools which support all of  TEI", whatever that might mean
>>>> --
>>>> Sebastian Rahtz
>>>> Head of Information and Support Group
>>>> Oxford University Computing Services
>>>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>>>
>>>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>>>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>