[tei-council] http://purl.org/tei/fr/3519866 (@rend datatype)

[Martin Holmes]

I'm on the other side of this debate, and equally biased. I agree that 
we need to take this on as a group, but I'd suggest scheduling it on the 
last day of the ftf so that if we get all heated about it, there'll be a 
natural end to the discussion. :-)

On 12-06-29 12:59 PM, Piotr Bański wrote:
> My view is similar to yours, so I'm not sure whether I would properly
> serve the greater good here. In case no one wants it, I can try, though
> this is now, I think, a very sore issue. It might be a good idea for the
> Council to act as a body on this.
>
> Maybe we could take it on in September?
>
>    P.
>
> On 29/06/12 14:33, James Cummings wrote:
>>
>> Is there someone who feels they can be neutral and objective who
>> would like to take on http://purl.org/tei/fr/3519866 which is the
>> ticket discussing whether @rend's datatype should be changed?
>> I'd prefer someone who is not already very much for or against
>> this to look at it.
>>
>> I'm hideously biased against loosening its datatype and the
>> existing recommendations that @rend values are separate tokens,
>> so don't feel I should take it on myself.  If you've not been
>> involved in the discussion so far and/or know nothing about it,
>> you might be the right person to re-examine it.
>>
>> -James
>>
>
>

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)