[tei-council] Private URI Schemes

[Stuart A. Yeates]

I think the <listPrivateUri/> tag is unnecessary, can't we reuse one
of the existing TEI header tags for this purpose? <encodingDesc/>?
Unless of course there are some specific semantics you're trying to
model.

You also use the word 'project' in the examples, surely that should be
'document' or 'corpus'?

Other than that it looks really good.

cheers
stuart

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Martin Holmes <mholmes at uvic.ca> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've had a couple of discussions about the magic token vs. private URI
> scheme issue over the past couple of meetings, and now I've put together
> a brief description of the way I had imagined putting the use of private
> URI schemes on a more solid footing than magic tokens:
>
> <http://wiki.tei-c.org/index.php/Private_URI_Schemes>
>
> Could you take a look and let me know what you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
> --
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived