[tei-council] <postscript>

[Sebastian Rahtz]

A gentleman of my acquaintance notes that this is illegal:

<postscript>
<p>some stuff</p>
<lb/>
<closer><signed>MM</signed></closer>
</postscript>

which seems harsh.

Would anyone care to know why we defined the content model of postscript
as

<zeroOrMore>
     <choice>
       <group>
<zeroOrMore xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0">
  <ref name="model.divTopPart"/>
</zeroOrMore>
<oneOrMore xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0">
  <ref name="model.common"/>
</oneOrMore>
<zeroOrMore xmlns="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0">
  <ref name="model.divBottomPart"/>
</zeroOrMore>
       </group>
       <group>
<ref name="model.global"/>
       </group>
     </choice>
 </zeroOrMore>

? i mean, why did we make model.global a choice all its own? the effect is that once you've met the <lb/>,
you go back to the start of the rule, and so <closer> fails cos there is nothing from model.common.

I know this is head-bending stuff, just vaguely hoping someone can see a rhyme or reason.

Sebastian