[tei-council] next release?

[Gabriel BODARD]

The first week of June is likely to be bad for me; I'm back from 
international travel around the 4th, I think, and will be groggy the 
first couple days after that. So if not May 25th, then best to put it 
off by two weeks. (Or someone else be launch technician...)

G

On 24/04/2012 10:42, James Cummings wrote:
>
> What do others think? We can of course move releasing back to
> whenever we've finished a majority of tickets, but I'd prefer
> sooner rather than later and a deadline that forces us to get
> stuff done.
>
> I'm of the opinion that we probably don't need to telco before
> this release (we can, after all, conduct business on the mailing
> list), but would do so shortly after the release to get updates
> on the longer-term issues and reports from the council working
> groups.
>
> thoughts?
>
> -James
>
>
> On 23/04/12 22:20, Piotr Bański wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> Isn't May 25 roughly in the middle of LREC? Could we shift by a week
>> from then, please?
>>
>> (I actually intend to be ready with my stuff [and possibly more] in
>> advance this time, but I've made some such totally honest promises to
>> myself and to the world recently, several times, and with meager results...)
>>
>> Ah. Will we telco before releasing?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>     P.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 23/04/12 17:47, James Cummings wrote:
>>>
>>> How about we set a notional target release date of 25 May?  (This
>>> is about 5 weeks from now.) If we assume that we want most things
>>> completed by the end of Sunday 20th, to allow time for
>>> proofreading and error spotting.
>>>
>>> Does that sounds reasonable to most people?
>>>
>>> Gaby: Most importantly, does the proposed Release Technician like
>>> these dates?
>>>
>>> -James
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/04/12 18:50, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>>> Three weeks will be a bit tough for me, and a couple of the tickets I
>>>> have might turn out to have unpredicted side-effects (like the tei_
>>>> prefix). As long as we have the option to launch without the change if
>>>> it proves difficult, we could go with three weeks.
>>>>
>>>> The attributes-without-examples problem is so large that we'll just have
>>>> to hack away at it steadily.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> On 12-04-21 04:03 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>>>>> something we forgot to debate in Ann Arbor was a timetable
>>>>> for the next release, I think? i.e. what is the due date for
>>>>> everyone to complete their ticket work so that Sir Gabriel
>>>>> of B'odard can undertake his Quest.
>>>>>
>>>>> speaking for myself, if I don't do my assignments
>>>>> more or less immediately I will not get to them for ages,
>>>>> so I favour a short window (say, 3 weeks).
>>>>>
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/