[tei-council] for 28 Feb. conf call: background on Best Practice for TEI in Libraries

[Sebastian Rahtz]

> 
> a) The encoding prescribed in the BP for Levels 1 and 2 is definitely 
> not TEI-conformant; I'm unsure about Levels 3 and 4.  Not sure whether 
> this would disqualify it.
> 
maybe you can give some background here. are levels 1 and 2

  a) non-TEI deliberately,
  b) only non-TEI pending resolution of feature requests, or
  c) non-TEI by accident, pending some editorial work
?

it would seem fairly weird for us to deliberately maintain customizations which are
not TEI-conformant.
--
Stormageddon Rahtz      
Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente