[tei-council] Next Release; Codename: GroundHog Day

[Martin Holmes]

I think there has been at least one schema-affecting change:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r10035 | gabrielbodard | 2012-01-12 09:54:18 -0800 (Thu, 12 Jan 2012) | 
1 line

added <geo> to att.declaring

So I guess we should be going for 2.1.0.

Cheers,
Martin


On 12-01-31 07:01 AM, James Cummings wrote:
>
> Just a reminder that any bugs, typos, corrections, and
> schema-affecting changes you've spotted in the Guidelines should
> be fixed by midnight tonight.  This gives us all of Wednesday 1st
> of Feb for proofreading and corrections of any additional typos
> we find, with an intended release by MartinH on Thursday 2 February.
>
> Is the next release going to be 2.1.0 or 2.0.2?  Correct me if
> I'm wrong but If there have been schema-affecting changes then
> the second number is meant to increment. Have there been
> schema-affecting changes since 2.0.1?
>
> -James
>
> On 18/01/12 00:13, James Cummings wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since no one else has piped up, can I suggest a schedule:
>>
>> 31 January midnight GMT: submission deadline of significant changes
>> 1 February: Whole Day for council to proofread and correct typos.
>> 2nd February: Release (Codename: Groundhog Day)
>>
>> Since Martin asked, I suggest him as release technician.
>>
>> Any reasons why these dates are wholly unsuitable?
>>
>> -James
>>
>> On 17/01/12 16:11, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>> Has there been any consensus on when 2.0.2 might be put out?
>>>
>>> (I ask because, if it's soon I won't both hacking the EpiDoc schema to
>>> allow geo/@decl; I'll just wait for TEI to introduce it and regenerate
>>> the schema properly. :-) )
>>>
>>> G
>>>
>>> On 2012-01-12 17:39, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I think we need to release a 2.0.2 soon, during which we again run
>>>> through the instructions, after adding the tagging instruction. Should
>>>> we do a quick trawl through the tickets and decide which ones might beS
>>>> polished off quickly without controversy?
>>>>
>>>> Can I be the one to go through the release steps this time?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> On 12-01-12 08:27 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
>>>>> Dear geeks again,
>>>>>
>>>>> again wondering: just downloaded the current release 2.0.1 from sourceforge (tei-2.0.1.zip) and the editionStmt at tei-2.0.1/xml/tei/p5subset.xml reads<edition>2.0.0 Last updated on<date when="2011-12-16">16th December 2011</date>.</edition>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that mean it wasn't updated at all or is just the editionStmt wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks again
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Martin Holmes
University of Victoria Humanities Computing and Media Centre
(mholmes at uvic.ca)