[tei-council] version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"

[Gabriel Bodard]

Given that a subset of 1. "ignore it" is potentially partly resolved by 
all of us (right?) having requested an exception to whatever ABP filter 
we use, it's not the worst option in the world.

2 & 3 both have the problem that is bothering Sebastian, but 3 is of 
course much worse in this case (2 being in practice (a) easy and (b) 
relatively minor inconvenience to anybody). I don't suppose you can 
write a rewrite rule for file fragments, can you?

My preferences, therefore, are (in order): 2 - 1 - 3.

Gabby

On 2012-01-18 12:24, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> no problem with dates. I'll need to do a new stylesheet release before then, to
> get the Guidelines formatting right.
>
> we have not resolved the issue about  AdBlock and "msad". can we choose
> between
>
>     1. ignore it. caveat blockor.
>     2. rejig our IDs to use "mss" instead of "ms" (a pain, and breaks published links). would it work?
>     3. rejig the stylesheets to rewrite all refs as tei_$whatever (needs dev work, breaks published links)
>
> My personal preference is in the order above.
>
> --
> Stormageddon Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group
> Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/