[tei-council] version 2.0.1 p5subset.xml states "edition 2.0.0"

[Gabriel Bodard]

Well, it adds @decl to one element. Is that not a content model change? 
Or do attributes not count?

On 2012-01-12 17:50, Lou Burnard wrote:
> As noted on the ticket, I think that's a straightforward error fix. And
> it doesn't change any content models. Just do it. ( now there's a catchy
> phrase, wonder if I can sell it)
>
> On 12/01/12 17:45, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> In that case, could I slip geo ->   att.declaring into this one? Or would
>> that be rude for a sub-decimal release?
>>
>> G
>>
>> On 2012-01-12 17:39, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I think we need to release a 2.0.2 soon, during which we again run
>>> through the instructions, after adding the tagging instruction. Should
>>> we do a quick trawl through the tickets and decide which ones might be
>>> polished off quickly without controversy?
>>>
>>> Can I be the one to go through the release steps this time?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 12-01-12 08:27 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
>>>> Dear geeks again,
>>>>
>>>> again wondering: just downloaded the current release 2.0.1 from sourceforge (tei-2.0.1.zip) and the editionStmt at tei-2.0.1/xml/tei/p5subset.xml reads<edition>2.0.0 Last updated on<date when="2011-12-16">16th December 2011</date>.</edition>
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean it wasn't updated at all or is just the editionStmt wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks again
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/