[tei-council] textLang and http://purl.org/tei/fr/3275613

Laurent Romary laurent.romary at inria.fr
Tue Dec 6 10:50:20 EST 2011


For me your text is crystal clear!
Thanks,
Laurent

Le 6 déc. 2011 à 16:43, Kevin Hawkins a écrit :

> Rather than nearly text found elsewhere in the Guidelines, I would just 
> insert this:
> 
> ###
> 
> The textLang  element may be used to record information about the 
> languages used within a bibliographic item.
> 
>     * textLang (text language) describes the languages and writing 
> systems identified within the bibliographic work being described. 
> 3.11.2.3 Imprint, Pagination, and Other Details 10.6.6 Languages and 
> Writing Systems
>       mainLang	(main language) supplies a code which identifies the 
> chief language used in the bibliographic work.
>       otherLangs	(other languages) one or more codes identifying any 
> other languages used in the bibliographic work.
> 
> Use of this element is described in 10.6.6 Languages and Writing 
> Systems.  Though that chapter implies that it may only be used for 
> manuscripts, it may in fact also be used in bibliographic references.
> 
> ###
> 
> Make sense?
> 
> On 12/6/2011 9:54 AM, James Cummings wrote:
>> 
>> I have done this, but not updated the prose or examples further
>> to indicate it is available in analytic/monogr/series as well.
>> 
>> Might someone with a better understanding of bibliographic markup
>> be willing to look at its discussion in CO?  The bit I partly
>> plagiarised from MS is found at:
>> http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca:8080/job/TEIP5-Documentation/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Guidelines-web/en/html/CO.html#COBICON
>> but now that it is available more widely maybe it should be
>> rewritten and inserted elsewhere?
>> 
>> -James
>> 
>> On 05/12/11 17:33, Laurent Romary wrote:
>>> +1; go ahead James.
>>> Laurent
>>> 
>>> Le 5 déc. 2011 à 18:19, Kevin Hawkins a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> On 12/5/2011 12:12 PM, James Cummings wrote:
>>>>> I note that I was not asked to add this to the content model of
>>>>> <analytic>    or<monogr>.... is that a problem?  I.e. you can now
>>>>> say what languages a work uses when using<bibl>    but not
>>>>> <biblStruct>.
>>>> 
>>>> More precisely, you can now give the language of a work described in
>>>> <biblStruct>   but not of the work in<analytic>   or<monogr>   within a
>>>> <biblStruct>.  I am in support of adding it to these two elements, plus
>>>> to<series>.
>>>> --
>>>> tei-council mailing list
>>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>>> 
>>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>> 
>>> Laurent Romary
>>> INRIA&   HUB-IDSL
>>> laurent.romary at inria.fr
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> -- 
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr





More information about the tei-council mailing list