[tei-council] Xpointer (was Re: Budget and Cost Saving for next year)

[Laurent Romary]

The idea of a small working group on this is an excellent one. Could someone stand up to take the lead on this?
Laurent

Le 28 nov. 2011 à 18:41, Gabriel Bodard a écrit :

> Can I ask, did Xpointer get any discussion in Paris? I don't see any 
> reference to it in the minutes.
> 
> There wasn't much of a conclusion to the email thread, as far as I can 
> see. Looks a bit like we were simultaneously coming to the conclusions 
> that (a) we should drop TEI Xpointer, and (b) it might not be that 
> hard/expensive to implement after all.
> 
> Assuming there hasn't been more discussion and decision-making that I've 
> missed, should we set up a small working group (containing at least 
> Piotr, Martin, Hugh Cayless, and whoever else we think might be 
> interested and/or competent) to discuss and make some concrete proposals 
> for how to go forward. I certainly see people who care about the aims of 
> the xpointer scheme, whether or not they think this is the correct 
> implementation of it.
> 
> G
> 
> On 2011-11-02 18:18, Piotr Bański wrote:
>> Ah,
>> 
>> I've had a closer look at the SF ticket too:
>> 
>> "The following schemes are supported by this implementation:
>> - XPointer element() Scheme
>> - XPointer xmlns() Scheme
>> - XPointer xmlns-local() Sc
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Gabriel BODARD
> (Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)
> 
> Department of Digital Humanities
> King's College London
> 26-29 Drury Lane
> London WC2B 5RL
> 
> Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
> Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
> 
> http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
> http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
> -- 
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr