[tei-council] Xpointer (was Re: Budget and Cost Saving for next year)

[Gabriel Bodard]

Can I ask, did Xpointer get any discussion in Paris? I don't see any 
reference to it in the minutes.

There wasn't much of a conclusion to the email thread, as far as I can 
see. Looks a bit like we were simultaneously coming to the conclusions 
that (a) we should drop TEI Xpointer, and (b) it might not be that 
hard/expensive to implement after all.

Assuming there hasn't been more discussion and decision-making that I've 
missed, should we set up a small working group (containing at least 
Piotr, Martin, Hugh Cayless, and whoever else we think might be 
interested and/or competent) to discuss and make some concrete proposals 
for how to go forward. I certainly see people who care about the aims of 
the xpointer scheme, whether or not they think this is the correct 
implementation of it.

G

On 2011-11-02 18:18, Piotr Bański wrote:
> Ah,
>
> I've had a closer look at the SF ticket too:
>
> "The following schemes are supported by this implementation:
> - XPointer element() Scheme
> - XPointer xmlns() Scheme
> - XPointer xmlns-local() Sc
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/