[tei-council] Disambiguation of <ident> and <idno> (and also <gi>)

[Laurent Romary]

Well, the thread missed identifying a good scope for idno (for the record, I second Martin's view on this). Making it recursive would clearly state the kind of things we want there (with the precise aim of identifying) and what we do not necessarily want (make it a documentary object). But there may not be a consensus on this.


Le 24 nov. 2011 à 14:30, James Cummings a écrit :

> On 24/11/11 12:51, Lou Burnard wrote:
>>> Should they then have the same content model (ident becoming recursive if Idno is)?
>> 
>> Hard to say no to that... tho I'd still rather see<hi>  permitted in
>> there....
> 
> Could I remind people on this thread about 
> http://purl.org/tei/fr/2994666 in which you all claimed I was 
> bonkers for wanting things like <g> and <desc> inside <idno>, but 
> finally relented to allow macro.xtext.
> 
> Just mentioning it,
> 
> -James
> 
> -- 
> Dr James Cummings, InfoDev,
> Computing Services, University of Oxford
> -- 
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr