[tei-council] surfaces and zones. (long)

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk
Sun Nov 20 06:15:06 EST 2011


Yes that was my intent, based on my understanding of  existing text and examples But I see the advantage of mandating zone.

Other views?

-- Sent from my HP TouchPad
________________________________
On 20 Nov 2011 11:10, Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
i read this as saying that an inner <surface> only needs an intermediate <zone> if you
want to say where it is. If you all you do is record the relative nature of two <surfaces>,
you can omit the <zone>. Was that what you intended? I tend to the view that its
easier to mandate the surface/zone interleave.
--
Stormageddon Rahtz
Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente



More information about the tei-council mailing list