[tei-council] signed/list

Lou Burnard lou.burnard at retired.ox.ac.uk
Sat Nov 19 14:17:40 EST 2011

On 19/11/11 19:02, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> One thing this discussion shows up is the varying views of what<list>
> is. In some minds, it is a block-level object, and abusive
> in a phrase-level context. In other minds, it is a typographic
> feature used widely all over the place, even within phrases
> (liked<signed>).
  The question is whether you think <signed> should contain one thing or 
several -- is it meant to be a "signature block" or a signature? My 
claim is that is not meant to be the former -- we already have <closer> 
(or <list> !) for that purpose.

More information about the tei-council mailing list