[tei-council] Fwd: Re: Notes on chapter 11 (part one)
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Thu Nov 10 07:47:18 EST 2011
On 10 Nov 2011, at 12:39, Lou Burnard wrote:
> Just to prove the point, no I don't think we should impose a bogus
> uniformity on the @rend values used throughout the Guidelines examples.
> I say "bogus" because there is no consensus as to what values we should
> propose and plenty of evidence that different projects choose to make
> their own rules on the matter. So the Glines really ought to demonstrate
> that there is a variety of practice in the matter.
it is not bogus to use the same discipline as we suggest to others….
_if_ the examples were drawn from real-life encoding projects,
and referenced as such, I might agree with you. But they're almost
universally not, they are concocted by the TEI writers and editors
> The implication that our readers are too unsophisticated to understand
> this is particularly objectionable. Maybe you'd like P6 to be rewritten
> in Basic English with all the big words taken out too?
yes, very much. There is no virtue in complexity _per se_.
Head of Information and Support Group
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente
More information about the tei-council