[tei-council] Unused parts of TEI P5 source
bansp at o2.pl
Wed Nov 2 12:40:18 EDT 2011
But, Martin, are you saying this as a TEI user, or as a TEI historian?
How often do you need to trace the development of content models between
On 02/11/11 17:35, Martin Holmes wrote:
> On 11-11-02 09:23 AM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> On 2 Nov 2011, at 16:09, Martin Holmes wrote:
>>>> do I hear any votes for zapping from Sourceforge entirely? in these days
>>>> of distributed version control, the practice of keeping things around
>>> "just in case",
>>>> or commenting out references, is a bit unnecessary.
>>> Let's not. Years down the road it might be difficult to figure out what
>>> revision they were last present in.
>> eh? is that a vote for keeping in SF or not? its easy to look
>> at Vault and see when they last appeared.
> It was a vote to keep, especially given that we haven't seen the
> reaction of the community to the decision to move them.
> If I'm a regular user looking at the Vault, this is what I see:
> I don't see an easy way to navigate to previous versions of P5, or to
> discover what might or might not be in them. It would actually be easier
> to grep the SVN log than to find this info in the Vault, unless I'm
> missing a finding aid for the Vault.
>> Stormageddon Rahtz
>> Head of Information and Support Group
>> Oxford University Computing Services
>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4054 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20111102/eceab1fc/attachment.bin
More information about the tei-council