[tei-council] Budget and Cost Saving for next year

[Piotr Bański]

How exhilaratingly cruel... Announcing their potential deprecation could
be a way to poll the community for how much they are needed.

The functionality behind them *is* needed, and would have to be recast
as individual attributes (@from, @to, ... many, I'm afraid, and in need
of discussion and standardization).

And, even dead, they are *so* elegant, sigh. They look much better than
Lenin.

On 02/11/11 16:29, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> 
> On 2 Nov 2011, at 15:21, Piotr Bański wrote:
> 
>> Speaking of budgeting for a programmer -- I realise and agree that Roma
>> is a priority, but let me also remind you of TEI XPointer schemes,
>> which, in the years since they were put into the Guidelines, got
>> implemented exactly *nowhere*.
> 
> a really cheap way to resolve this one is to remove all reference
> to the TEI XPointer schemes from the Guidelines.
> 
> they were a nice idea, cute puppies, now its time to drown them :-}
> 
> --
> Stormageddon Rahtz      
> Head of Information and Support Group
> Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> 
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4054 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/pipermail/tei-council/attachments/20111102/92824a93/attachment-0001.bin