[tei-council] agenda items

Laurent Romary laurent.romary at inria.fr
Tue Oct 4 05:11:35 EDT 2011

Le 4 oct. 2011 à 11:09, Piotr Bański a écrit :

> + the licensing issue, possibly, as the Council's proposal


> I've asked our lawyer to have a look at the general idea that I believe
> is close to consensus now (is it?):

It is. I'm doing some more reading and James helped me formulating something.

> * software under BSD-2
> * docs (generated HTML) under CC BY
> * schemas, ODD, pending precedents and codification --> choice up to the
> licensee, depending on whether they need them as software or documentation
> He said it sounds good to him.

Good, since it seems to sound good to the council.

> Let me also repeat that with this conclusion, we need a place in the ODD
> to at least:
> * specify the license(s) of the entire ODD (that's already there)
> * specify the license on the generated documentation (would @type be
> enough? it's not fully fitting semantically)

We can worked this out afterwards. 

>  P.
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
laurent.romary at inria.fr

More information about the tei-council mailing list