[tei-council] dimensions and ranging in editLike

[Laurent Romary]

How many content models should we have to fix accordingly?
Laurent

Le 29 sept. 2011 à 19:40, Gabriel Bodard a écrit :

> Well, one solution would be not including att.dimensions and att.ranging 
> inside att.editLike, but rather including them explicitly on those 
> elements that we think need them. (Or is it not that easy?)
> 
> G
> 
> On 2011-09-29 18:34, Martin Holmes wrote:
>> I wholeheartedly agree that the problem needs fixing, but I don't see an
>> easy solution. Does anyone have any suggestions?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>> 
>> On 11-09-29 09:37 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> While adding a ticket for the model.glosslike issue as recommended by
>>> Laurent, I came across this ticket which nobody has commented on and I
>>> wonder if anyone noticed:<http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3291540>. (In which I
>>> recommend that it would be tidier to remove attributes such as @atLeast
>>> and @precision from elements with no numerical value or contents such as
>>> <supplied>.)
>>> 
>>> Any thoughts?
>>> 
>>> G
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Gabriel BODARD
> (Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)
> 
> Department of Digital Humanities
> King's College London
> 26-29 Drury Lane
> London WC2B 5RL
> 
> Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
> Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
> 
> http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
> http://www.currentepigraphy.org/
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr