[tei-council] dimensions and ranging in editLike

[Gabriel Bodard]

Well, one solution would be not including att.dimensions and att.ranging 
inside att.editLike, but rather including them explicitly on those 
elements that we think need them. (Or is it not that easy?)

G

On 2011-09-29 18:34, Martin Holmes wrote:
> I wholeheartedly agree that the problem needs fixing, but I don't see an
> easy solution. Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> On 11-09-29 09:37 AM, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> While adding a ticket for the model.glosslike issue as recommended by
>> Laurent, I came across this ticket which nobody has commented on and I
>> wonder if anyone noticed:<http://purl.org/TEI/FR/3291540>. (In which I
>> recommend that it would be tidier to remove attributes such as @atLeast
>> and @precision from elements with no numerical value or contents such as
>> <supplied>.)
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> G
>>
>

-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/