[tei-council] genetic draft -- from Brett

[Lou Burnard]

On 24/08/11 10:59, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> On 24 Aug 2011, at 10:53, Lou Burnard wrote:
>
>>> I can live with sourceDoc, though I wish it didn't look so much like
>>> sourceDesc, thus sort of inviting my brain to try to systematize the
>>> semantics of "source" in a way that I think "isn't supported."
>>
>> Yes, I had that worry too. How about<source>  ?
>>
> already in use :-{

drat

>
> <transcript>  /<transcription>  ?

seems odd if it contains facsimile?

>
> <original>  ?

hmmm..... what about forgeries?

maybe we'll drift back to <document> eventually...