[tei-council] genetic draft -- from Brett

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 24 Aug 2011, at 10:53, Lou Burnard wrote:

>> I can live with sourceDoc, though I wish it didn't look so much like
>> sourceDesc, thus sort of inviting my brain to try to systematize the
>> semantics of "source" in a way that I think "isn't supported."
> 
> Yes, I had that worry too. How about <source> ?
> 
already in use :-{

<transcript> / <transcription> ?

<original> ?



>> 
>> As others have said, I think we need to have a new element instead of a
>> repurposed<ab>. My first thought was also "block," though it doesn't
>> make me giddy. Like sourceDoc, it seems at least serviceable. Part? Bit?
>> Chunk? Morsel?
> 
> Since I took it on myself to add <ab> to the draft, I have also taken it 
> on myself to replace it with <block> in the most recent draft (not yet 
> HTML-ised, sorry).

<chunk> would be ok too, if people dislike <block>

--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Head of Information and Support Group
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente