[tei-council] <licence>

[Gabriel Bodard]

Right right right! Because, as we haven't mentioned here, licensing is 
not the only sort of information you might include in <availability>. 
(Where to go and get it, under whose authority it is released, what 
larger collection this file may be part of, etc.)

On 2011-08-22 18:07, Lou Burnard wrote:
> Indeed it is. But we also probably want
>
> <availability>
>        <license target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">
>          <p>...</p>
>        </license>
>       <p>  ....</p>
> </availability>
>
> unless you wish to cast into the outer darkness all those existing TEI
> headers which currently say
>
> <availability><p>Oh it's kind of available when the moon is full,
> usually.</p></availability>


-- 
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Research Associate in Digital Epigraphy)

Department of Digital Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL

Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980

http://www.digitalclassicist.org/
http://www.currentepigraphy.org/