[tei-council] <licence>

[Lou Burnard]

On 22/08/11 12:45, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
> On 2011-08-22 12:14, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> not sure what you are arguing for, then? the choice is
>>
>>      <availability>
>>        <licence target="…">…blah blah .</licence>
>>     </availability>
>>
>> or
>>
>>      <availability>
>>        <p>Blah blah<licence target="…">….</licence></p>
>>     </availability>
>>
>> I am arguing in favour of the latter, and believe it is perfectly amenable
>> to entirely automated processing (availability//licence[1])
>
> Apologies if I haven't been following this thread closely enough. Is not
> one possible solution:
>
> <availability>
>     <license target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">
>       <p>...</p>
>     </license>
>     <license target="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html">
>       <p>...</p>
>       <p>...</p>
>     </license>
> </availability>
>
> ?
>

Indeed it is. But we also probably want

<availability>
      <license target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">
        <p>...</p>
      </license>
     <p> .... </p>
</availability>

unless you wish to cast into the outer darkness all those existing TEI 
headers which currently say

<availability><p>Oh it's kind of available when the moon is full, 
usually. </p></availability>