[tei-council] <licence>

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 22 Aug 2011, at 14:34, James Cummings wrote:

> 3. licence as div-like object
>> <availability>
>>    <licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">
>>      <p>...</p>
>>    </licence>
>>    <licence target="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html">
>>      <p>...</p>
>>      <p>...</p>
>>    </licence>
>> </availability>
> 
> Given that some licences insist you include a copy of the 
> existing source's licence with the material, or similar, my 
> preference for these is number 3.


I could be convinced by that.

what would the content model of <availability> be?

  1.  (licence+ | p+)
  2.  p*,licence*
  3.  model.availabilityPart+

(where model.availabilityPart includes p and licence).

I'd tend to vote for 3.

--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Head of Information and Support Group
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente