[tei-council] Green for Go

[Lou Burnard]

On 02/04/11 16:08, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:


 >

>
> some of these can indeed be put to bed, but I don't think 3064182, 3064182, 3051750, 3041605
> are ready to just nod on, as they actually need someone to do work which could then
> be offered for approval.

Yes, I was hoping someone might volunteer to do some of that.

>
> I think 3041705 is a rogue in the Green list, as its Tite-specific.
>
which is why it does not appear on the list.

so, here is the list  divided into two

non-controversial?


 >> 3193507	data.code is defined as xsd:anyURI 2011-02-26
 >> 3080658	definition of 'entry'	2010-10-04
 >> 3190122	att.typed for gramGrp  2011-02-23
 >> 3064014	provide suggested values for rs at type 2010-09-11	
 >> 3046288	allow f to contain pcdata


in need of input?

 >> 3064182	examples for digital facsimile	2011-03-14
 >> 3064182	Check desc of all xs:anyURI atts for in-doc restrictions 
2010-09-11
 >> 3051750	choice of schema language when using the TEI 2010-08-23	
 >> 3041605	update list of Council members	 2010-08-