[tei-council] is TEI Lite defined by inclusion or exception?

[Laurent Romary]

Shall we put this as an item on the f2F agenda?

Le 26 mars 2011 à 21:20, Laurent Romary a écrit :

> Clearly Lite a fixed beast and should rely on an inclusion spec. Maybe a good opportunity to think over what we really want to have in there.
> 
> 
> 
> Le 26 mars 2011 à 19:55, Lou Burnard a écrit :
> 
>> My vote is with James, more or less, except that I think we might want 
>> to argue about what "currently" means.
>> 
>> My view is that TEI Lite is a historical artefact, dating from c. 
>> 2006-2007, i.e. release 0.5 of P5. Any elements added to P5 after that 
>> date, if present, are there (probably) by accident.
>> 
>> (I suppose you could argue for making the baseline be release 1.0 though)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 26/03/11 18:33, James Cummings wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> My vote would be for it only to include what it currently includes. Things should only be consciously added to it rather than them getting it as a side effect.
>>> 
>>> -James
>>> 
>>> 
>>> James Cummings, InfoDev, OUCS, University of Oxford (from phone)
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Sebastian Rahtz [sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk]
>>> Received: Saturday, 26 Mar 2011, 14:29
>>> To: TEI Council [tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU]
>>> Subject: [tei-council] is TEI Lite defined by inclusion or exception?
>>> 
>>> It's clear that TEI Tite  should be expressed in terms of what _is_ in it, not by what is _not_.
>>> 
>>> How about Lite? when a new element is added to P5, should it appear in Lite?
>>> 
>>> The hot money is on Lite being an _inclusion_ ODD, but seems worth seeing whether anyone
>>> feels strongly the other way.
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Rahtz
>>> Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
>>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>> 
>>> Sólo le pido a Dios
>>> que el futuro no me sea indiferente
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tei-council mailing list
>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>> 
>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tei-council mailing list
>>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>>> 
>>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tei-council mailing list
>> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>> 
>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
> 
> Laurent Romary
> INRIA & HUB-IDSL
> laurent.romary at inria.fr
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tei-council mailing list
> tei-council at lists.village.Virginia.EDU
> http://lists.village.Virginia.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr