[tei-council] mess up over tei_all.xsd

[Sebastian Rahtz]

On 2 Mar 2011, at 14:19, Lou Burnard wrote:

> I assume what you mean is we shouldn't sneak in major changes like -- 
> oh I dunno -- genetic criticism support without incrementing the second 
> (as opposed to the third) digit.

quite

> 
> By the way,  are we sure that the next number after 1.9 is 1.10? I quite 
> fancy 1.A myself, but that's probably because I spent my formative years 
> reading hexadecimal dumps

I was hoping you'd have that conversation Chicago when I am not there
and so  I don't have to come up with an opinion.....

if we got gen crit and music in, I'd go for 2.0.0 and avoid the problem
--
Sebastian Rahtz      
Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente