[tei-council] mess up over tei_all.xsd

Sebastian Rahtz sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Wed Mar 2 09:23:45 EST 2011

On 2 Mar 2011, at 14:19, Lou Burnard wrote:

> I assume what you mean is we shouldn't sneak in major changes like -- 
> oh I dunno -- genetic criticism support without incrementing the second 
> (as opposed to the third) digit.


> By the way,  are we sure that the next number after 1.9 is 1.10? I quite 
> fancy 1.A myself, but that's probably because I spent my formative years 
> reading hexadecimal dumps

I was hoping you'd have that conversation Chicago when I am not there
and so  I don't have to come up with an opinion.....

if we got gen crit and music in, I'd go for 2.0.0 and avoid the problem
Sebastian Rahtz      
Head of Information and Support Group, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente

More information about the tei-council mailing list