[tei-council] Roma, ODD-processing in XSLT 1.0
Sebastian Rahtz
sebastian.rahtz at oucs.ox.ac.uk
Mon Jan 31 13:35:31 EST 2011
On 31 Jan 2011, at 18:29, stuart yeates wrote:
> I have in the past been an advocate / holdout for XSLT 1.0 on the basis
> that XSLT 2.0 has only a single implementation and that ties us to the a
> particular tool chain.
I have never used it, but Altova offer an implementation of XSLT 2.0
I do agree, it makes me nervous too. but then I think we should write
write a new ODD processor in another language than XSLT anyway,
as a higher priority.
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information and Support Group Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente
More information about the tei-council
mailing list